Matlock's back! Kathy Bates to star and executive produce in new series

Madeline Matlock will take on new cases soon.

Fans of wily septuagenarian lawyers are in (Mat)luck! 

Television viewers are set to meet a new criminal-defending Matlock, this time named Madeline. According to MovieWeb, CBS has ordered the Kathy Bates-led Matlock pilot into a series. This will make CBS the third out of the Big Three networks to get a slice of Matlock action; The Andy Griffith-starring Matlock originally aired on NBC from 1986 to 1992. When NBC canceled that series, ABC opportunistically swooped in, picking up Matlock for an additional three seasons.

The new Matlock will follow a format similar to that of the original. As Madeline Matlock, Kathy Bates will again use unmatched smarts to get the best out of her cases, solving brand new weekly mysteries all while practicing law. The Academy and Emmy Award-winning Bates will be joined by a brand new cast of characters, played here by Skye P. Marshall, Jason Ritter, David Del Rio, and Leah Lewis. 

The new Matlock will be classified as a "re-imagining" of the classic series, so there won't be any mention of Ben Matlock or plot details from the Andy Griffith series. While the Kathy Bates Matlock might contain some easter egg references to its predecessor, this new series will be entirely its own thing. 

CBS has released the official Matlock description: 

“After achieving success in her younger years, the brilliant Madeline Matlock (Bates) rejoins the workforce at a prestigious law firm where she uses her unassuming demeanor and wily tactics to win cases and expose corruption from within. Based on the classic television series of the same name."

In addition to Kathy Bates, pilot director Kat Coiro, Jennie Snyder Urman, Joanna Klein, Eric Christian Olsen, and John Will round out the list of executive producers. 

Watch Matlock on MeTV!

Weekdays at 10 AM

*available in most MeTV markets
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Mannixishot 7 days ago
I'm not a fan of current tv series. Overall it's just reality crap or remaking old stuff with a twist--let's make Matlock a woman this go round! Might as well just watch the original because it'd probably still hold up in today's times.
Tradesman 7 days ago
I would be willing to give it a try There's been a few shows that have done remakes and it turned out pretty good so I'll give Kathy Bates a chance
AgingDisgracefully 10 days ago
Already planning to not watch it all over again.
joenic27 11 days ago
"Reimagining" (likely) = "Woke" plot lines infecting much of TV and movies these days. I'll likely pass on this one.
mugens joenic27 10 days ago
When you used the term "woke" you lost all credibility.
StrayCat joenic27 10 days ago
They couldn't pay me to watch this.
mugens 10 days ago
This comment has been removed.
Sooner 11 days ago
So, if it's entirely its own thing and will totally ignore the real show, what's the point of calling in Matlock? Why not call it Fetlock?

I wouldn't watch this with a paid contract.
Wapkep1982 12 days ago
Another attempt to revive classic series with a pale imitation. It will have all the baggage of comparison with half the fun. What made the classics classic was the freedom to work without fear of offending some group. Will the new Matlock continue the conspiracy story lines of the old one? Seems like everyone except the accused was complicit in the murders in the Griffith-era iteration.
Pacificsun Wapkep1982 11 days ago
Nicely said!
FloridaTopCat 12 days ago
And the advantages of using the name, "Matlock", but not basing the show on moving ahead 30 years and throwing in references and maybe even remembering cases from Ben Matlock - those advantages are what?
Lacey 12 days ago
"re-imagining" of the classic series, so there won't be any mention of Ben Matlock or plot details"

Then why do it? Why not try (again) to give Bates an original show?
"Well, we are going to call it Cheers but it is a re-imagining and will not feature a bar, Boston or any reference to the previous and beloved show. "

Good grief.
Pacificsun Lacey 11 days ago
Again, nicely said!
57Tbird 12 days ago
Hollywood can't leave things alone. AMC did a remake of Patrick McGoohan's classic The Prisoner in 2009. That was an epic fail.
mugens 57Tbird 10 days ago
Agree, that was a big disappointment.
Deleted 12 days ago
This comment has been removed.
Pacificsun 11 days ago
Well. What actually happened, and why the phenomena (as was enjoyed in the day) will never return. Is that freedom of speech (incl. opinion and point of view/experiences) have been co-opted for purpose (and not discovery). The first and second generations of television writers (producers) came from the golden age of those who expressed themselves with authenticity. Everyone might not have agreed. But they weren't afraid. And the point was in being a platform for discovery, sharing, and complimenting one another's effort. Meaning, there was permission to build upon itself. And the reason why (if there are any at all) that so few exist in this day, as being utterly outstanding.

Streaming, rather than capitalizing on their (assumed) advantage, sold out to easy profit. As have they all. And it's only going to get worse from now on. Another reason why couching new development is under the (assumed) safety net of a reboot. The title is supposed to distract us from innate deficiencies (otherwise known as, excuses). Kathy Bates, as an executive, is going to have to work pretty ding hard to break through that wall.
JJK 12 days ago
They should made Kathy Bates Matlock's daughter, carrying on the business. The suits have no imagination!
Wapkep1982 JJK 12 days ago
Ben had two daughters in the original. Maybe a granddaughter?…wait! Kathy Bates is too old to be Ben’s granddaughter.
pbrez12 12 days ago
Big problem is that all these "creative geniuses" are products of the American educational system. They don't know how to think for themselves nor are they adept at critical thinking.
Deleted 12 days ago
This comment has been removed.
Pacificsun 10 days ago
Never fond of her since she was in a movie about torturing somebody endlessly. Was it TV or a made for ... movie, not sure. But it was creepy.
texasluva 10 days ago
Misery 1990. She won an Oscar for it. I liked it because I wanted it to end in revenge. It did. Your biggest fan brings you back to health then tortures you when everything she wishes to hear doesn't go her exact way. I would have shown it by now except the quality was not so good. I do not remember much about her afterwards. You can say it was creepy as the movie unfolded.
bobcapps 12 days ago
Don't forget the worst remake of all time. M-A-S-H. Swit totally missed it on Hotlips, Alda wasn't Hawkeye, he was Bugs Bunny, and Morgan was some Alzheimer's imagining of the uncle on Arsenic and Old Lace
Deleted 13 days ago
This comment has been removed.
Snickers 13 days ago
Heck, why not bring back Adam-12 with Pee Wee Herman and Jack Black as officers Reed and Malloy?
12 days ago
This comment has been removed.
justjeff 14 days ago
Snickers justjeff 13 days ago
Wake up! Oh wait, never mind.
texasluva 14 days ago
Hollywood and TV show producers have been ravaging the archives for years. Some early after like The Man From U.N.C.L.E. to the Girl From U.N.C.L.E. Return of the Man From U.N.C.L.E. to the 2015 movie of the same name. Get Christy Love was also re-introduced Without going through dozens of them now, Kathy Bates (75 year old in June) will return us to Matlock. Aren't we having fun 🙄. Maybe Will Smith can play her Go-To-Guy tracking down all the info one needs for a case. I believe I read somewhere since 2000 there have been well over 10,000 TV shows of most everything one could imagine. Who has time for 100 of them? I've watched a total of 3 all the way through since 2000. The District--The Walking Dead--The Americans and maybe parts of a dozen more. I do not think I will be tuning into this new one being touted.
Wiseguy70005 texasluva 12 days ago
You're confusing reboots, sequels, spinoffs and reunion movies.
Pacificsun texasluva 10 days ago
So the problem becomes ... how many times can somebody be accused of a crime, and not be guilty, and somebody is trying to prove that. There is just no more twist left to the plot. Which means, to reboot it there has to be a point (a reason) meaning a motivation (duhhh). How simple can it get, developing a viewership. And if they're trying to appeal to those who enjoyed the original, why bother when we have classic TV.
texasluva Pacificsun 10 days ago
The motivation is money. Producing, Directing, acting and all the other people involved in movies or the 10's of thousand TV shows/series. Some have run for decades, some for years and many for i-2 years and the pilot and that's about it. Some have tremendous fan bases while others meh. The object is to get others on board and hopefully pan out. Way too much for me to handle or watch. I had fun watching the few this century I ended up watching and they lasted long enough to keep your attention. The District I watched it 3 times over a few years ago. The Walking Dead and gang lasted 11 seasons and watched with a friend every Sunday. They always showed the week before in case you missed and when the next season started they showed them from previous weeks before. Basically I watched it twice. Of course the classics you never get tired of and watch them again a few years later. Now without MeTV (I switched providers last year) I probably should drop one or Netflix which would pay for MeTV via Frndly TV or buy an antenna because is locally shown.
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?